cross-posted from: https://discuss.online/post/34598392

FBI Director Kash Patel said Monday that he had opened an investigation into the Signal group text chats that Minnesota residents are using to share information about federal immigration agents’ movements, launching a new front in the Trump administration’s conflict there with potential free speech implications.

Patel said in an interview with conservative podcaster Benny Johnson that he wanted to know whether any Minnesota residents had put federal agents “in harm’s way” with activities such as sharing agents’ license plate numbers and locations.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    As others have mentioned, Signal is secure.

    You need to set the group chat messages to auto-delete after a set amount of time. If you’re really concerned, set it for hours instead of days. That way if these terrorists abduct you and force you to unlock your phone, they have a very limited pool of messages to view.

  • Armand1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    17 hours ago

    “Don’t protect yourself or others, even peacefully. You’re obstructing the oppression.”

  • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    This guy permanently looks like he’s having an existential crisis and I can’t help but wonder if it’s because he’s metaphorically the only Jew left in the Nazi bar.

  • protist@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    A lot of “investigations” going on. Call me when they successfully bring charges

  • artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Boy I sure hope those people aren’t using their real names or phone numbers…they should absolutely NOT be using Signal for this purpose. This kind of thing is why SimpleX exists.

    • THX-1138@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      joined the chats

      Typically, law enforcement officers access Signal chats by obtaining a group chat member’s unlocked phone, being directly included in the group chat, or receiving copies from a participant.

      From The Guardian: "The FBI has allegedly claimed that information related to the “courtwatch” Signal chat was given to them by a “sensitive source with excellent access” and said that they filed the report as a warning about “extremist actors targeting law enforcement officers and federal facilities.”

      Signal itself Is secure. Like everything, however, human elements can still be penetrated. No protocol no matter how secure can protect you from a spy infiltrating a group, or a group member being coerced into handing over the content of the chats.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Signal itself Is secure.

        I didn’t say it wasn’t. The problem is when exactly this happens and then people doxx themselves in the chat.

        No protocol no matter how secure can protect you from a spy infiltrating a group

        SimpleX protects you by not requiring a phone number, and by supporting multiple and anonymous accounts.

    • DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Or even PeerSuite for that matter, moreso if a PeerSuite session is additionally ran through an anonymous protocol like I2P, assuming that’s possible. I mean, PeerSuite doesn’t require an account, doesn’t use servers, talks through encrypted WebRTC channels, and doesn’t leave a paper trail by default, coordinating protests is a perfect use case for it because people could start up a session to plan said protest, and then close the session without a trace when they’re done.

    • Tilgare@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      At this point, I don’t even know why Signal shouldn’t be used here. But I’m so sick of the stream of good apps that enshitify and get replaced by apps that also enshitify. I assume something like that has happened here. Is nobody left on this fucking planet that will stand up for the things they believe in?

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        don’t even know why Signal shouldn’t be used here

        Because Signal does not support anonymity. If someone joins the group using their real name they also happen to use in their personal lives, they’ve just doxxed themselves and painted targets on their backs.

        • Tilgare@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          But doesn’t Signal support disappearing messages? And end to end encryption? Meaning they’d need a recipient’s phone in order to see them at all. Although, now that I’m thinking it through in this context of a big group chat full of people you don’t/barely know, I can see the higher risk profile. So it’s bad in this circumstance, assuming messages are persistent.

          • jet@hackertalks.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 day ago

            Disappearing messages are a client side convention, they are not part of the protocol, they cannot be enforced. There are signal clients that never expire messages, screen capture, archive, etc

          • sobchak@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yeah, I used to be in a group where I’m pretty sure a couple people were informants or agents. A couple people would fed-post in the Signal group sometimes.There were leaks that showed the FBI was indeed “monitoring” the group. I suspect any lefty group is infiltrated is some way.

          • artyom@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            But doesn’t Signal support disappearing messages?

            Yes, and? It also supports screenshots.

            Meaning they’d need a recipient’s phone in order to see them at all.

            Which is what they have.

              • artyom@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                17 hours ago

                By default they’re not but I mean you could just pick up another camera and take a picture of the screen anyway, so you’re not really preventing anything by disabling it.

                • Tilgare@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  Right, so how do the other solutions solve this problem then? Kinda undercutting your own security argument with ways that NOTHING is actually secure.