Should I give her my CC number to keep her company?

  • Cracks_InTheWalls@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    So real talk, what exactly is the angle here? Are these rogue instances in the links? Truly just trying to bait in the lonely and gullible to eventually solicit payment down the line?

    It just seems … weird for a romance bait scam. Average looking woman (though could be to lower guards), links to Fediverse service profiles rather than botted DM exchanges, etc.

    I could just be being naive, but idk. There’s a very particular brand of fishy to this, beyond the obvious. The other probable scammer I dealt with at least came with a sob story that I could see being more effective (end of his rope humanitarian worker in an African country, children dying due to lack of $ for the program).

    • idegenszavak@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I watched the stream, it was just a very long looped video of the girl in the photo, looked the same one day later. It seems like it’s been deleted today. The Friendica profile also nothing extraordinary. I guess the scam should be on the chat, it required one more click after opening the site, and I never heard of this stumblechat, so I didn’t bother. After some searching I can’t find a lot info on this Stumblechat, it definitely has nothing to do with the fediverse.

  • MHLoppy@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I can’t believe that my own copy of this spam is how I found out that we have lemmy <-> mbin dms working now lmao

  • expatriado@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    awww, we got our own community chic? she’s everyone’s girlfriend now, also, 45 y.o. and a man

    • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Plausibility? If the photo like a model or something, everyone would know something’s up. But if it’s of an average-looking woman, you can imagine it’s some awkward nerd chick who might well share your nerdy interests.

  • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yes ok but you don’t need to be doing their job for them. Blur that shit.

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s not about respecting the privacy of a spambot. it’s about doing their job for them. The bot wants their links and their advert to be seen by as many eyeballs as possible. Guess what the OP just achieved? Blur all links next time.

        • towerful@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I disagree.
          Saying “this is a scam” with the links visible is more transparent. If the scam changes but the links are similar, it will hopefully raise a red flag for someone.

          Blurring them does nothing other than obfuscating the details of the scam.
          Shine light onto the darkness and document it.