That’s your opinion. Him being an asshole or not is neither proof (nor lack thereof) of his guilt. And if you know for sure he’s a rapist, submit the proof to the court. The alleged victims would be very happy to have it.
Yes, my opinion is that the sketchy grifter with a history of shitty behavior and years worth of allegations is likely guilty of doing the bad shit he gets accused of. Its a logical conclusion based on the facts available. As I said, I’m not a court. I am free to draw my own conclusions. What’s wrong?
That’s your opinion. Him being an asshole or not is neither proof (nor lack thereof) of his guilt. And if you know for sure he’s a rapist, submit the proof to the court. The alleged victims would be very happy to have it.
!remindme 1 year to make fun of you after he’s convicted.
Yes, my opinion is that the sketchy grifter with a history of shitty behavior and years worth of allegations is likely guilty of doing the bad shit he gets accused of. Its a logical conclusion based on the facts available. As I said, I’m not a court. I am free to draw my own conclusions. What’s wrong?
If your argument is that you’re free to have an opinion, that’s not much of an argument. Opinions are like assholes, everybody has one.
My argument is that Russell Brand is a piece of shit and I’m glad he is facing justice.