• Agent Karyo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    That’s true (I am here after all), my point was that the Lemmy devs’ tankie position is a liability for the growth of federated networks.

    Not everyone is going to be spending time to understand the details and nuances.

        • Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 days ago

          Wait wait two people on the Internet having a misunderstanding and then talking it out and ending on a positive note??? Never thought that was possible

          Wholesome <3 I love this place

    • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      my point the Lemmy devs’ tankie position is a liability for the growth of federated networks.

      The responses to fundraising for Lemmy development recently is a perfect example of that

      • Agent Karyo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        Lemmy under the current devs (especially Dessalines) will never see string growth.

        Dessalines is too busy banning people for daring to say that North Korea has a bad government to do any coding.

        • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 days ago

          Have to agree.

          That .ml is so closely tied to development (and previously the first landing space) is problematic, there were a bunch of people asking if donations were purely to dev or if they supported the .ml servers at all as well, because they didnt want to provide any financial support to .ml.

          And thats even aside from precisely the issue you mention.

          I really think its one of the bigger reasons behind all the piefed support.