• DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    3 hours ago

    In terms of security alone, iPhones easily beat most Android phones. Which may be a fair argument in favor of iPhones. However, to ignore Apple’s policies and long history of delisting similar apps is delusional.

    • squaresinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 hours ago

      In regards to security, Apple does have three upsides, and only those:

      • No sideloading and no unlocked bootloader means you can’t sideload malware or install malware-preloaded ROMs. No root also means you can’t just install malware that uses root access.
      • Long OS support means fewer people run around with iPhones that are 5 OS versions behind.
      • There’s no tiny boutique iPhone manufacturers who sell phones that come pre-loaded with malware.

      The solution for the first one is “don’t sideload untrusted stuff” and the solution to the second and third one is “buy an Android phone from a trusted manufacturer that has long term OS support”.

      • liuther9@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Long os support meant to intentionally brick your iphone so you buy new. That is 100% true as I had many apple products started degrading after upgrade and still have old models that are not upgraded and work perfectly

        • squaresinger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I’m not defending apple here. Short OS support (or none at all) is not a good thing, and it’s something that’s sadly still quite common if you buy the wrong Android brand.

          Samsung is doing pretty well in that regard right now.

      • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Based on most smartphones being very insecure. Of course, iPhones aren’t extremely secure, but the competition is practically nonexistent. Pretty much the only secure Android phones are Pixels. Samsung is considered one of the more secure manufacturers too, but according to GrapheneOS devs it’s still way behind Google.

        Note that even police and government agencies sometimes have trouble getting into iPhones. They never have such troubles getting into Android smartphones, except Pixels.

        This is by no means meant to advertise iPhones. It’s just a simple observation that security in smartphones is heavily lacking.