75% of the US stock market growth of the past few years has come from AI, but that was built on a promise. That AGI was just around the corner. Now companies like OpenAI are pivoting to selling ads and porn, a sure sign they do not think AGI is about to arrive.

If the AI bubble bursts, what happens afterwards?

I’d guess there will be a backlash against Big Tech. Perhaps 2025 is the high watermark of their political influence. AI is already broadly unpopular with many people, and that will only grow when they see if it has crashed the economy and their pensions.

AI, the technology, will still be with us, even if many of today’s AI companies won’t be. Even without AGI, it still has the potential to be transformative and economically disruptive. Rules-based businesses — legal, accounting, transaction, and claims processing could all be made obsolete. Humanoid robotics and self-driving, both aspects of AI, will eventually replace millions of human workers.

The AI bubble crashing would mean a recession. Recessions mean companies cut workforce numbers. Ironically, this time, they will be able to replace many of those people who were let go with AI. So the crash that AI causes will also speed its adoption.

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    It’s gonna be like the dotcom crash. Bloody great hole (trough of disillusionment), parasites fuck off to new shinies, actual techs keep plugging away until a useable product becomes ubiquitous 20 years later.

  • artifex@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    The kind of “nice” thing about the AI bubble is that strictly speaking AI (of the sort driving stock prices, cloud LLM-based services) aren’t really needed for anything. They’ve increased efficiency in some places, but for the most part are still a solution looking for a problem. It will still suck for those exposed to the market, but unlike say the 2008 crisis, it hasn’t been forcing people into houses they can’t afford or predatory loans of terrible provenance.

    • ignirtoq@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      They’ve increased efficiency in some places

      Where have they demonstrably increased efficiency at all? I can only find people talking in the abstract about how AI provides a net benefit. All of the studies I can find show that once actual scientific measurements of efficiency, productivity, or quality are made, at least one of those suffers more than any modest gains provided by AI, if there are any gains at all.

  • TootSweet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Even without AGI, it still has the potential to be transformative and economically disruptive.

    Yes, in the same way as a landmine is transformative and anatomically disruptive.

    Rules-based businesses — legal, accounting, transaction, and claims processing could all be made obsolete.

    No.

  • cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    So many false assumptions. What’s currently called AI is exclusively LLMs and those can’t accomplished anything without very close supervision. The fact that they need close scrutiny of their every output makes their productivity gains quite small if there are any. Recent studies have shown that e.g. in the one area where you might expect them to perform well, programming, they lead to a net slowdown.

    When they bubble finally pops well be left with what’s mostly an amusing toy with very, very limited use cases outside of cheap entertainment.

    There will be immense financial repercussions that will have to be shouldered by the general public, as usual. The companies and executives will move on to the next hype after a while.

    • reksas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The richest will just accumulate more wealth while rest of us will have even less due to getting laid off, having to sell assets for less than they are worth and having take debt to survive

    • m532@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Usa can print infinite money, so they could theoretically keep inflating to infinity.

  • danhab99@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Well … TBH I can’t really say for certain what bc I can’t say for certain what was before this AI bubble… apps? Maybe? I’m not certain about that.

  • metaStatic@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Stochastic computing, Sub-nanometer Ternary chips, neuro-symbolic agents that are functionally what has been promised with LLMs at a fraction of the compute.

    oh politically? yeah, America is fucked, learn to speak Mandarin because that’s what your AGI overlords will speak.

    non-zero chance they use all that compute to attack the bitcoin network first though.