- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
You must log in or register to comment.
Make no mistake. Just like the housing bubble of 2007 and 2008 there are people poised and ready to make tons of money off of the deflation of the AI bubble.
Jacked to the tits…
Don’t threaten my good time with a threat
Don’t worry, I’m sure there will be a huge government bailout that the people have no say in. Remember 2008? I don’t remember voting to give away piles of money to the bankers.
You know what Iceland did when there was suspicious investing and they had bank failures? They put the bankers in jail! What did we do? We gave them a bonus!
God bless America, because we’ll need it!
America is really bizarro world compared to other countries and how they handle things like this.
It just seems like in America, you can fail upwards, con people and still get out filthy rich.
This is a threat. They know that they’re using the stock market to find their greed and that anyone with saving tied up there (Retirement funds that are invested in the market) will be on the hook. Plus the tax payer money they’re going to ask for because they’re “too big to fail”.
The sooner the better. Less LLM infatuation means better customer service, less overall environmental impact, and more water available to cities.
I agree, but the doomer in me just figures we’ll be on to the next grift. Fuck.
And lower RAM price.
That you still won’t be able to buy because the economy popped with the bubble.
The sooner the better. Can’t wait!
Kaboom! 💣 💥
Let me fix that for you: “When an AI bubble pops…”
The plumbers will. The electricians will. The carpenters will. The bricklayers will. The farmers will. The steel plant workers will. The dockyard workers will.
Yes, if you’ve got savings invested it’ll touch you, but the actual jobs - you know the ones adding and making real, concrete things, probably won’t notice a big different if the AI stocks tank 30% in a day.
Who is “no one”? Because yeah, there will be splash damage, but some sectors (“AI” companies and the megacorps involved in the massive ongoing self-dealing circlejerk) will collapse, but others will simply see a correction. And I’ve already dumped anything LLM-related (as well as most US-based securities and ETFs) as of early this year. So I’ll take a hit (everyone will take a hit), but it’s not going to be nearly as bad as it will be for all the bag holders.
Tech companies will ask (and get) an enormous bailout so they don’t have to fire everyone, and then they will fire everyone anyway. In order to recoup some of the budget losses, King Trump will implement one or two more taxes
Let’s be very clear: Pichai is one of the Very Big Assholes whose name should be uttered in the same breath with Thiel, Altman, Zuckerberg etc.
He drew comparisons to the late 1990s Internet boom, which saw early Internet company valuations surge before collapsing in 2000, leading to bankruptcies and job losses.
“We can look back at the Internet right now. There was clearly a lot of excess investment, but none of us would question whether the Internet was profound,” Pichai said. “I expect AI to be the same. So I think it’s both rational and there are elements of irrationality through a moment like this.”
Equating the dot-com bubble with the internet. Only a $trillion company CEO could spout such bs. And the misinterpretation translates very well to AI.
Frankly, what I’m getting from this article is “Hey, we’re not the #1 in the current hype, so would everybody else please slow down a little so we’re all at least on equal footing again?”
And the idea that it could all burst, leaving not only Google/Alphabet utterly destroyed - don’t threaten me with a good time, Sundai!
AI winters and history repeating itself. As a concept it’s here to stay, but every incarnation leads to a cycle of misconception, hype, and disillusionment
Too big to fail is too big to exist. Break them up.
I will get out totally clean of that, so thank you and fuck you
I’ll be fine.
[he] addressed the “immense” energy needs of AI, acknowledging that the intensive energy requirements of expanding AI ventures have caused slippage on Alphabet’s climate targets. However, Pichai insisted that the company still wants to achieve net zero by 2030 through investments in new energy technologies. “The rate at which we were hoping to make progress will be impacted,” Pichai said, warning that constraining an economy based on energy “will have consequences.”
We need “line go up” so badly, we’re willing to bake the planet.
“We will have to work through societal disruptions,” he said, adding that the technology would “create new opportunities” and “evolve and transition certain jobs.”
Someone once described AI as “a way for the wealthy to access the benefits of the skilled, without allowing the skilled to access the benefits of wealth”.
or since there are FOSS AI models that are free as in free beer it allows everyone to access the benefits of the privileged - i.e. those who can specialized in fields like arts that aren’t conducive to making enough money out of the gate to survive as a working class person
“Privileged” lol.
If you couldn’t make a poem before “AI”, you still can’t make a poem now.
Do you have another retort besides “lol”? Spending the amount of time required to produce professional art when an income isn’t directly guaranteed is a risk most of us can’t take, FYI.
You still can’t make
Yeah and why would I need to?
If I don’t enjoy that particular process nearly enough to learn how to make it good, and I wanted it to be good and I was feeling creative and had an idea for it, I could just get it made for me, free of charge, free of corpo influence or any strings attached. It’s a sweet deal.
Spending the amount of time required to produce professional art when an income isn’t directly guaranteed is a risk most of us can’t take, FYI.
Because you don’t care about making art, so you choose comfort and financial safety. It has nothing to do with “Privilege”.
You’re talking about outsourcing art, but then complain about who actually make art.
Art isn’t output/result. That’s exactly what you’re getting from your gen slop.
Oh the great technology god will help us. We will have so much reduction, you cannot imagine! We have no idea how but surely throwing money at it will get things done. Trust us!
Was that a threat?
And I hope he wasn’t threatening everyone who participates in the global economy.
Was that a threat?
“Google might break! Please be careful!” - the threat of a good time.
Lol that’s how I read it, or at least trying to suggest they’re in a Mutually Assured Destruction scenario.
“No bail-out, no economy” basically.
