My feed has been filled with rpg geeks shitting on him. I do not know why. I assume he said something nasty, or did something worse than his usual disgusting foot fetish.

Why do I see Tarantino drama constantly? What triggered it?

  • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    He’s got too much money and he’s bored. He’s not working any more and no one cares about his stupid hot takes. Dude needs to work in a soup kitchen or food bank. He needs to do something useful.

  • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Everyone’s mentioned feet but not the gratuitous n-bombs he writes for himself to say?

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      People do talk like that every day. Since he was a teen, his mother exclusively dated black men and he cites a few of them as role models in his last book.

  • TabbsTheBat (they/them)@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    14 hours ago

    He insulted Matthew Lillard, who is famous for playing Shaggy from scooby do. Matthew also appeared as a guest star on Legends of Avantris, a D&D show/podcast, not long ago hence the overlap between the 2

    • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I guess he does have many credits as Shaggy. I thought he’d be known for being the main bad guy in Scream. And, on this platform, I thought we’d all go for Hackers. No, just me and u/zerocool?

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 hours ago

        In Hackers he wasn’t really the protagonist, more of a (really good) side character IIRC. It was also in 1995.

        In contrast, he’s got some 50 or 60 credits as Shaggy now, spanning from 2002 to whenever he stops being Shaggy. Live action, animated, LEGO versions, games, etc.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Of the movies you listed, Hackers is the only one I’ve seen. Hack the planet!

      • TabbsTheBat (they/them)@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Im just going by what I saw people say when I first encountered tbh :3 I couldn’t name you a single celebrity or what they’ve been in honestly, actor names is not a thing I ever paid attention to lol

        • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I get that for people who had his live Shaggy role their entire lives. Scooby was primarily a cartoon for me. But I was surprised and understanding of him potentially being most famous for Shaggy, as he has like 20 credits to his name. Presumably for a lot of voice work

        • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I dunno, he was in Scream 6 and will be in 7 since apparently they want to keep going with this series. I still see Ghostface masks every year at Halloween. But, sure, I can agree his presence in the movie isn’t as culturally significant.

          On the flipside, Shaggy is an existing character to me that happened to be played by Lillard in later adaptations. He’s not the face of Shaggy to me because Shaggy was a cartoon first.

          But that’s my take.

            • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Scream 3 was the bad one, IIRC — it’s only up from there!

              Whichever one gave Ghostface the super power to copy anyone’s voice. Dumb AF. And doesn’t return in the newer films.

              They’re all pretty clever, but that one was a bit daft.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      14 hours ago

      He also took some totally unnecessary shots at Paul Dano, saying he was the worst actor in the SAG. That’s a bizarrely personal attack out of nowhere on a guy you never worked with.

      • Godric@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Frankly, I loathe the professional unwillingness to criticize anyone else. Some people frankly suck at acting, and they shouldn’t have to be Wiseau bad before anyone says something.

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Criticism is fine, when you’re talking about someone’s work and how to improve it. Calling someone “weak” and “the worst actor in the SAG” is deeply personal and insulting.

          Revealing a personal bias in a professional setting belies unprofessional attitudes and prejudices. Tarantino isn’t a critic, he’s a filmmaker and an influential voice in the industry. Taking pot shots at a couple of B-list character actors is hurtful on a personal level, and wantonly destructive on a professional level. The power dynamic between producers and actors is massively unbalanced. It would be like the CEO where you work talking shit on LinkedIn about project managers at a rival company. If he’s saying this publicly, what is he saying behind the scenes? Is he trashing actors to casting directors to influence their careers?

          He has every right to say “I don’t want these people in my movies.” It would also be professional to say “I did not like this specific performance for these specific reasons.” It’s extremely unprofessional to say “I hate these people because of who they are and anyone working with them is on my shit-list.”

          • Godric@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Well Jerkface, because I have grown to dislike the constant corporate euphemism born of utter terror of controversy.

        • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Agreed. I’m not a fan of Will Ferrel’s acting, but I have nothing against him as a person. Would it be so wrong for me to say I do not enjoy his movies or his comedy, but I’d be willing to speak to the man and maybe enjoy a chat over coffee or something? He’s probably a decent person. Maybe he’s not. If I met him, I’d only treat him with respect until he taught me otherwise. Still don’t care for his movies.

          Same with Adam Sandler, but I’ve seen him actually act. Reign Over Me was the first one I saw him act well in. “Men, Women & Children” is another one.

  • async_amuro@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I agree the Dano and Lillard comments are probably a part of it… but also the “Fortnite Kill Bill” shit definitely didn’t help. He’s always been a questionable human being and I grew older and lost interest with him, be into feet all you like dude, but he seems totally disconnected from society for a while. Also his hyping of the Weinstein’s back in the day 😬

  • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The only thing I’m aware of is him publicly slating a could of actors. He was very critical of Paul Dano from There Will Be Blood (which is a bit weird because that movie has been out for a long time). He also publicly slated Matthew Lillard, who seems like a genuinely nice guy and has a lot of fans. I think those (especially the criticism of Lillard) pissed a lot of people off.

  • Lumidaub@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Don’t kink shame, it hurts nobody.

    Edit: the kink is what hurts nobody, naturally, is what I mean. I am severely sleep-deprived. Forcing people who work for you to cater to your kink is of course scum behaviour.

    • Godric@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I’m no prude, but it causes me at least 1d4 psychic damage every time I see him force an actress to rub her feet against the camera for his own sexual gratification.

    • trashcroissant@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      If it’s a (usually sexual) thing that would normally require consent (like any other fetish), and Tarantino is using his power as director to persuade women actors to show their feet (e.g. Margaret Qualley), then yes, absolutely it is hurting someone and he is using his power to appease his fetish, which is gross. The fetish itself is not gross, idgaf if someone’s into feet, but it’s not okay to force others into your fetish.

      • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Tarantino is using his power as director to persuade women actors to show their feet

        OK, what’s going on here? Isn’t being a director a part of art and expression, so expressing “here’s a pair of women’s feet, that shit turns me on” a part of art?

        The actresses can see the script, they know it’s Quentin Tarantino, it’s like the cat looking in box meme. What did they expect, no taking video of your feet for the worlds biggest foot fetishist?

        It’s abuse of power when he does that shit unexpectedly behind the scenes.

        If you want to be mad at Tarantino for abusing an actor, try the car stunt with Uma Thurman

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uma_Thurman#Kill_Bill_car_crash

        In the same 2018 New York Times interview, Thurman described how she had been in a serious car accident back in 2003 on the set of Kill Bill, because Tarantino had insisted she perform her own driving stunts.[182] Two weeks after the crash, she tried to see footage of the incident. Thurman stated that Miramax would only agree to show her the footage if she signed a contract “releasing them of any consequences of my future pain and suffering”, which she refused.[182] As a result of the crash, she sustained permanent injuries to her neck and knees.[182] Tarantino later called this incident “the biggest regret of his life”.[183] Thurman later clarified on Instagram that Tarantino had apologized to her for the incident and that she has since forgiven him,[184][185] being open to working with him again.[186]