• marius@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    ·
    2 days ago

    The post headline is BS. It’s 70% more efficient than other thermoelectric materials. Not compared to current compressor fridges. Also no device ever can be powered by its ambient temperature, because thermodynamics says no

    • huppakee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Thanks it got me confused, seemed so good that it had to be false but the title was also not very clickbaity.

      Edit: opened the article anyway, this is the actual title above the article: Thin film thermoelectric cooling built with semiconductor process technology

      • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think the userbase of a community being clueless enough to tend to upvote anything vaguely good-sounding is a big factor in me eventually deciding to unsubscribe from that community. It doesn’t seem like it is a fixable problem once it develops.

        • SchizoDenji@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          It’s a big problem with reddit like forums where the comments are highlighted and much more densely presented than the article itself.

          Older forums avoided this (unintentionally) by not having any sorting on replies and keeping the density of replies, low.

      • Luffy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        TL;DR one side gets hot, while the other gets not very cold

        So in order for the very hot side to not heat up the cold side, negating the cooling effect, you have to have a whole water cooled noctua 480mm fan assembly cooling that 2 cm*2 surface, just so that thingy can get to like 10C

        • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Also, it’s by definition impossible for it to have better than 100% cooling efficiency, which is already the norm for refrigeration-cycle-driven machines.

          There are niche applications where it can be the right answer, but no amount of improvement to this specific technology will ever make this as good as existing refrigerators.

      • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I was looking at the thumbnail and wondering if it was these. Yeah, imma go with Alec on this one.

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    These are just Peltier cooling mechanisms highly refined it seems. If they’ve increased the efficiency enough that a full-sized refrigerator can keep food cool without refrigerant or a constant electrical signal, that’s huge. AFAIK Peltier coolers still need some electrical input, though minimal.

      • Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Efficient enough to run a fan from the heat of my woodstove, so it’s got that going for it. And there are 12V coolers people keep in their cars. How efficient does it need to be? If they’ve improved on standard peltier junctions, maybe it is worth it. Why so negative?

          • just_another_person@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            These aren’t the same thing as a proper Peltier mechanism as you’d expect it to be implemented with a quality build. These are cheaply built evaporative coolers, not an industrial design.

            I’ve deployed industrial units for outdoor enclosures that run on solar with no battery in places that get up to 115F during the day and do decrease the temp of an enclosure by 15-25F. They aren’t cheap, but they do work better than those shitty things referenced in your link.

            • Pistcow@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              That’s cool. Figured there had to be an industrial option which is always costly. So as soon as cost comes down for consumer grade that’ll be nice.

    • rtxn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m calling bullshit. There’s no way a Peltier element can exceed the coefficient of performance of the refrigeration cycle, at an affordable price, without turning the room into a hothouse.

        • rtxn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I’m not questioning the findings. I’m questioning the article, and your interpretation to arrive at such a summary.

          APL plans to continue to partner with organizations to refine the CHESS thermoelectric materials with a focus on boosting efficiency to approach that of conventional mechanical systems

          energy-harvesting technologies for applications ranging from computers to spacecraft

          70% improvement in efficiency in a fully integrated refrigeration system.

          It’s all potential, and possibilities, and future projections. I’m sure someone will find real world applications for it, but a fridge tacked out with Peltier tiles that draws energy from its ambient environment (while actively ruining the thermal gradient by the way) is ludicrous.

      • Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Umm, a typical refrigerator cranks out a lot of heat. Why would would this be less efficient than that?

          • Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Read the paper, it’s linked below. This is solid state, there’s no refrigerant. Heat pumps are efficient, and this IS a heat pump, which is far more efficient than the old school heat pump that uses a ‘refrigeration cycle’. I’m with you on being skeptical, and it may be a long time from ‘discovery’ to production of a saleable device, but this IS a legit significant breakthrough.

        • just_another_person@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Modern refrigerators only generate heat through the capture by refrigerant inside and the pump circulating air. Without those, it’s a different story. A Peltier cooling device works similarly, but I can see it being more efficient overall since you would know where the heat ends up. Think car radiator or CPU heatsink. Same basic concept.

    • Lugh@futurology.todayOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      without refrigerant

      Yes, they say this does away with the need for compressors or refrigerants.

      “This cools by using electrons to move heat through specialized semiconductor materials, eliminating the need for moving parts or challenging coolant liquids.”

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes, that’s a Peltier device by definition. The efficiency of them as of now are not great, so the big news here, if reproducible is that they’ve refined a process that gets them up to 70%.

        Huge if true.

    • adhocfungus@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I was not aware of this and bought a Samsung washer and dryer set a few years ago. Noticed one day that the dryer would keep spinning after the cycle ended. Then noticed that it started spinning before I turned the dryer on. I quickly realized that it now spins any time the door is shut, even when off.

      Looked online and this is apparently a known mechanical bug in several models due to cheap components. So I can either unplug it or keep the door open anytime it’s not in use. Never buying another Samsung either.

  • Bosht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    This would be fucking insane if true and gets scalable. If Samsung has the tech though those assholes are going to upcharge it to a luxury item and we’ll never see it.