• vortexal@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I guess that’s cool but I don’t think I’ve ever seen a website that actually hosted MKVs. What are some websites that have MKVs?

    • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Being able to direct stream content from jellyfin without needing to repackage on the fly to another container would be nice.

  • lemming741@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Me to handbrake for two decades: stop trying to make MKV happen! It’s not going to happen!

    Guess I owe them an apology

  • Zarxrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Well, it took them long enough. The container has been around for over 20 years now.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 hours ago

      WebM is just Mastroska with most features disabled that are not relevant to streaming and a mandated set of codecs, so basic Mastroska support would have been possible years ago, simply by accepting the Matroska MIME types.

    • paris@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 minutes ago

      It supports more codecs and I believe can store more tracks compared to MP4. Whenever I download a high quality movie or tv show, especially if it has multiple audio tracks and subtitles to choose from, it is always packaged in .mkv

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      More refined subtitle support (better timing, more flexibility in how they are presented and better timing) Complex chapter structure (think dvd menus and “bandersnatch” interactive movies and probably things nobody has thougth of doing because of lacks in the technology), segment linking (linking to a file and a timestamp, so you can reuse sections such as intros etc…) Arbitrary file support, to embed anything, text documents, subtitle font files, cover images, license information, client side storage High precision timestamps, rich metadata

      One great thing is it can be extended, so it’s future proof, one bad thing is, it can be extended, so of course Apple made extensions that only work on their shit

  • jqubed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I didn’t know that was something that’s been available in Chrome. Also not entirely sure what I would use it for since I’ve mostly seen it with rips of Blu-ray movies and shows, never smaller files. I thought its main advantage was holding multiple video, audio, and data streams.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Also not entirely sure what I would use it for since I’ve mostly seen it with rips of Blu-ray movies and shows, never smaller files. I thought its main advantage was holding multiple video, audio, and data streams.

      WebM shows that Matroska is excellent for streaming. It’s the same container, WebM just mandates a set of codecs (just as MP4 as an offshoot of MOV can theoretically hold non-MPEG codecs but nobody supports this in the real world). With formal Matroska support, something like combining a HEVC video track with an Opus audio would be possible.

    • psycotica0@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      It’s highly popular in the anime scene for its ability to contain original audio and dubs and a few subtitle tracks, including custom fonts for some of the subtitle formats that are feeling particularly special.

      • Chronographs@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Not that firefox actually supports any of those advanced sub formats lol (I’d be surprised if chrome did either though tbh)