If giant megacorporations can benefit by ignoring copyright, us mortals should be able to as well.

Until then, you have the public domain to train on. If you don’t want AI to talk like the 1920s, you shouldn’t have extended copyright and robbed society of a robust public domain.

Sorry to say, but he’s right. For AI to truly flourish in the West, it needs access to all previously human made information and media.

If I had to pay tuition for education (buying text books, pay for classes and stuff), then you have to pay me to train your stupid AI using my materials.

As an artist, kindly get fucked ass hole. I’d like compensation for all the work of mine you stole.

“How are we supposed to win the race if we can’t cheat?!”

“The plagiarism machine will break without more things to plagiarize.”

Okay.

It was fun while it lasted.

For someone.

I presume.

Good, end this AI bullshit, it has little upsides and a metric fuckton of downsides for the common man

I find it odd that Lemmy users are so adverse to tech.

What a giant load of crap.

Oh no anyway.jpg

This is exactly what social media companies have been doing for a while (it’s free, yes) they use your data to train their algorithms to squeeze more money out of people. They get a tangible and monetary benefit from our collective data. These AI companies want to train their AI on our hard work and then get monetary benefit off of it. How is this not seen as theft or even if they are not doing it just yet…how is it not seen as an attempt at theft?

How come people (not the tech savvy) are unable to see how they are being exploited? These companies are not currently working towards any UBI bills or policies in governments that I am aware of. Since they want to take our work, and use it to get rich and their investors rich why do they think they are justified in using people’s work? It just seems so slime-y.

I’ll take him seriously if & when OpenAI lives up to its name.

I am good with that.