• Weebdeluxe@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Why exactly are we still bringing this up? We all know it was a shitty thing to do… this post reeks of ragebait.

    • finkrat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Piracy is a service delivery failure

      While it won’t stop everyone, if that game were freely available I’m sure there would be several less folks emulating them right now

    • Glytch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Emulate the old games. Unlike the original SMAS, 3d All-Stars added nothing to the experience that can’t be done with emulation. I say this as someone who bought it.

  • slimerancher@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    I remember hearing from many people, “I wasn’t going to buy it, but it’s only available for a limited period, don’t want to miss out on it”.

    I voted with my wallet, and didn’t buy it. I lost the vote though, since it sold pretty well.

    Which explains why they did it. They created some hype, and earned some money, and still kept it for making some quick money by remaster / re-release when needed.

  • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    Reads like it was written by an ai:

    • drones on with tangential information
    • doesn’t answer the question
    • Walican132@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I mean the first sentence answered the question. It was available for a limited time due to 35th anniversary. It’s a dumb reason but the answer is right there.

      • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It’s a rhetorical non-answer, “the 35th anniversary release was only available for a limited time because it was only available for a limited time”.

        There are hundreds of anniversary releases of games that are made permanently available - hence why people asked Nintendo why this one was given an artificially short availability so often that it became an FAQ question. They own the rights, they can sell it indefinitely if they want.

        Eg: search Steam for ‘anniversary’ you’ll find 600+ results.

  • misk@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    „Japanese like it this way and we’re a Japanese company, deal with it” is a perfectly fine explanation. Japanese consumers love limited drops.

  • TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    It’s in the first three words of the article. It’s celebrating the anniversary, so you buy it during the anniversary period. How long do you celebrate your birthday for? If you got a birthday present to celebrate your 35th birthday six months after you turned 50, is it still a 35th birthday present?

  • fpslem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Also, it should have had Super Mario Galaxy 2, it was crappy that they went from 4 games down to 3 for that All Star collection.

    • Batman@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Thanks. I’ve never had the urge so bad to click no on the “Is this info helpful” question before.

  • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yeah, I had to buy a physical copy of eBay for like 90 bucks. It was bullshit, but my kid wanted it for his birthday and I couldn’t say no.