• notsosure@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Here some ideas. You could be sued, but what is equally bad is that they might take revenge in some other way, everybody has a weak spot, and they can find it. Why would you want to hurt these people anyway, time has passed. The best revenge is to not mention them at all, especially for big egos being ignored is the worse punishment. As long as you write about facts, they can’t sue, e.g. this guy fired me may be fine (if factually 100% true), but he seduced my boyfriend is tricky (it may be true, but hard to proof /disproof). You may consider changing all the names, places etc, and turn it into a book of fiction.

  • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    13 hours ago

    If it’s true, and you’re in the US, you’ll be fine. If it’s not true, and they can prove it, they can sue for libel.

  • vrek@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Anyone can sue anyone else for anything…

    I could sue you for having anal sex with my night stand… I would lose since you didnt(I hope) and that’s not illegal but I could sue you for it…

  • Regna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Depends on the laws in your country, where I live we can’t even mention the name and crimes of convicted pedos on social media.

  • L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Ask for professional legal help, randoms online can’t help you with this. The answer is highly nuanced and depends on the specific manner in which you have things phrased.

  • Štěpán@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    15 hours ago

    If they sue you for spreading lies about them, consider who would win. Probably discuss with a lawyer and tell them the specific cases you want to write about.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      It isn’t even necessarily a question of who’d win.

      You can tell the absolute truth and technically “win” all the defamation lawsuits you want, and still lose.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          and sometimes, they still are used appropriately, and still end up with a ruined life.

          if the other side has fuck-you money and you don’t have fuck-you money, guess what their strategy is going to be?

  • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Instead of a memoir, why not make it “fictional”? Change the names, slap on a boilerplate “any resemblance to actual persons or events is coincidental” disclaimer, call it a day.

    IANAL, not legal advice, etc.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      That’s not actually a solid defense as “fictional” characters that are obviously someone that exists can still be ruled libel. A common informal defense is to give the fictional person a small penis. It doesn’t change anything legally, but it does require someone suing you to admit in court that they have a small penis.

  • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    15 hours ago

    people mentioned are still alive

    Well, you know what you have to do…

    (this is not legal advice etc etc)

  • jeffw@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Anyone could sue you. Do you have money to pay for a lawyer?

    Also, a publishing firm would know the series risks with this

  • _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    It depends on where you publish it: In the United States, the truth is a complete defense to libel suits, so you wouldn’t get in any trouble. This, of course, assumes that you can prove the contents of the book and have not signed any NDAs that would prohibit such a book.

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    As long as what you publish is truthful and they don’t suffer any actual damages, you should be fine.

    But as always ask a lawyer.

    • mech@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      As long as what you publish is truthful and they don’t suffer any actual damages, you should be fine it’s not illegal.
      If the people you write about are rich and influential, it doesn’t have to be illegal for them to ruin you in court.

      • slazer2au@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        That’s true, and should absolutely talked about with the publisher of one ever take OP on

  • droning_in_my_ears@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    If you publish it anonymously, then none at all… well unless it goes super popular and it’s specific enough they can tell it’s you.

    If I ever publish something like that I’d call it “I’m burning bridges, bitches!”