I know there’s great love for Oblivion (I never played it when it was new), and of course Skyrim is the gold standard for new fans (I played the shit out of that and it was my first entry into the elder scrolls back when it came out 14 years ago…) but I really feel like this shadow drop of a half assed remake is just priming everyone to lower their expectations for the likely dumpster fire that is The Elder Scrolls VI.

I know its old hat nonsense of a complaint but whatever Bethesda used to be it stopped being that 20 years ago and we’re all just stuck thinking they’ll put out some new masterpiece when in reality all the talent they had back in the day has likely left for other jobs and they are now just a shitty company among countless other shitty companies putting profit over anything else and stifling anyone who might actually have good ideas on how to make good games (how unsurprising).

  • Dr_Box@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 minutes ago

    You’re not going into depth on how it is half assed. The only thing I can complain about is some performance drops when travelling outside, but I imagine they’ll patch that out at some point. If you’re referring to the classic oblivion stuff like goofy npcs and most of them having the same voice actor tbh I’d be pissed if they changed that

  • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    45 minutes ago

    half assed remake

    which is exactly why they called it a remaster. it was never their intention to remake the game.

    Personally I think most of the stuff that went wrong with Starfield were design choices related to space travel and many many planets, which won’t be an issue with TES of Fallout going forward. So if they stay in their lane I don’t see any reason why they can’t keep churning out decent titles in those series, even if they maybe don’t reach the same heights.

  • zerofk@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    When I saw the post’s title I was hoping for a good, perhaps even balanced, critique of the remake’s choices, or the underlying engine’s shortcomings, or perhaps even the original designs.

    All I got was “dumpster fire”.

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    5 hours ago

    There‘s no Oblivion remake. Go to the Steam Page and carefully read word for word what it is you‘re talking about.

    • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      44 minutes ago

      I play Fantasy Critic with some friends. We allow remakes in our league but not remasters. This one counts as a remake for purposes of this site, with a flag on it to note that it was contentious. This game definitely blurs some lines on some definitions.

  • Default_Defect@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Listen, as long as ESVI ends up being highly modable and has a healthy community behind it to make the mods, it’ll be good enough for me.

  • Stovetop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    153
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    I think Bethesda has definitely fallen off in recent years, but I am a bit confused by the point this post is getting at. We learned at launch that Oblivion is a remaster, not a remake, and it’s just the original game running under the hood with a new coat of paint and some minor tweaks. And it’s a pretty high-effort remaster at that.

    I just think it’s a bad example to use of how the company isn’t getting better, when the point of the remaster was to change as little of the core game as possible. It’s as good now as it was back then but it’s still a 19-year-old game.

    Starfield is what should be killing everyone’s expectations of Elder Scrolls 6.

    • MudMan@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The remaster was also made externally, so whatever the point being made here is, it’s weird twice over.

  • lordnikon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Just to clarify one thing while i agree with you on some stuff this is not a remake it’s a remaster. the OG game engine is running underneath and UE5 for just the updated models and terrain. The fact they are charging so much for it is what kills me. What this should have been is a $30 game of the year edition and maybe an discount or a free upgrade of you owned the original like they did with doom and quake remasters that nightdive did.

    • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Yeah I’ll definitely buy it, but I’m a patient gamer. It needs to be really cheap on a steam sale. I’ve played the original. I can wait.

  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Man the negativity. I’m so sick of gamers negativity. It’s not even a new game, it’s a remaster. you knew what the product was going to be. It’s oblivion. We all knew it was oblivion. If you don’t like oblivion, why did you buy it?!

    I swear to God if they changed it too much I’d be commenting here on a post about how they had no respect for the original. Then we wonder why “they never listen to gamers”. Because we bitch and moan about everything.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      38
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s not even much of a remaster. They just slapped a coat of paint on it.

      The Gamebryo/Creation Engine is still there running the game, it just uses Unreal 5 for the graphical elements. And they updated some of the levelling to work more like Skyrim, because the Oblivion system sucked in comparison.

      It’s still the same 20 year old Oblivion under the hood.

      Not that there’s anything wrong with that, but calling it a remaster is a bit disingenuous.

        • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          More than a coat of paint. They didn’t actually port the game to Unreal 5, they just used it to make the graphics look better. The modding community could have done this years ago if that’s all they wanted to do. Skyblivion is more of a remaster than this official one.

          With all of the resources of the original development and sources, I expect more than the modding community is capable of.

          • Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            28
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Emm, no. If you build something from the ground up it’s called remake.(Demon Souls, the Resident Evil series) Remastered is taking the old game and put on a fresh paint of coat and give it some modern QOL so it’s much more accessible today.

            Skyblivion is closer to remake than remaster.

            Also i feels like you misunderstand why people like this game.

            • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              If you’re fine paying $50-60 for what amounts to a community graphical overhaul mod that’s fine. I expect more from an actual developer with access to the source code.

              A remaster should be releasing Oblivion with an updated engine and graphics, and bringing in some gameplay enhancements from newer games. Technically this meets those requirements, but only by the bare minimum and all of those can be achieved with community mods for free.

              A remake would be completely abandoning the decrepit Gamebryo/Creation Engine that’s clearly dragging all of their games down now, and has been for over a decade, and actually giving us something that doesn’t feel like it came out 20+ years ago.

              I love the Elder Scrolls, Oblivion is one of my favorite games of all time, and the only one I ever bothered to get every achievement for back on the 360. But I won’t accept a half assed remaster for nearly full price just because it’s what Bethesda wants to distract everyone from the fact that Elder Scrolls 6 isn’t coming out anytime soon and they couldn’t just release Skyrim for the 12th time.

              Don’t accept paying for mediocre products just because you’re desperate for content.

    • Donebrach@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      34
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Just musing on the fact that Bethesda doesn’t care about making games and instead just cashes in on nostalgia. I also think their finance bros realized their upcoming big IP drop is going to be an objective POS and wanted to prime people’s expectations by re-releasing a 20 year old game with some lipstick on it.

      It would be neat if they hired some people who actually had innovative ideas about gameplay, visuals and stories to maybe make a neat new game within an existing or new IP, but they haven’t done that in literal decades so I think its pretty reasonable to not be incredibly excited about anything they are putting out or planning to put out in the future.

      • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        As a long time Bethesda game fan I agree with you on almost everything you’ve said about Bethesda… But the remaster is a terrible example of your points.

        The remaster does exactly what it says on the tin and they’ve been very upfront about how it was made and why it was made in the launch video.

        It’s hard to criticise them for cashing in on nostalgia when they’ve shown time and time again with Skyrim re-releases that do a fraction of what the Oblivion remaster does still sell like hot cakes.

        Nostalgia is at the core of their business model. That’s why they march Skyrim’s corpse out every two years like clockwork; that’s why they picked Fallout for a new franchise after ES; that’s, frankly, likely why Starfield sucks so much.

      • torrentialgrain@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Imagine if capital G Gamers actually enjoyed playing games instead of nonstop bitching on online forums.

  • unused_user_name@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    7 hours ago

    It might be nostalgia speaking, but I think the real issue is that a 20 year old game can actually be this good and popular. How can it be that it is more enjoyable than anything else I’ve bought over the last year (at least)? Doesn’t that say that game companies in general have dropped the ball on game design, focusing on graphics and money over content and gameplay? As I said, it might just be me stuck in my wonderfully comforting blanket of nostalgia…

    • Flickerby@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Clair Obscur came out the same time and it’s probably the best RPG I’ve ever played, and I’ve played every noteworthy one in the last 40 years at least. GOTY at the LEAST.

    • MudMan@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I think it’s almost definitely nostalgia speaking.

      Granted, by the point Oblivion was made I was the nostalgia guy talking about how Bethesda games kept getting smaller and less ambitious. Most people saying that then did so because they were coming from Morrowind. Not me, I am a proper dinosaur and I was just pissed that after Morrowind dropped everything interesting about Daggerfall to make a console game they just kept moving further in that direction.

      Was also not a fan of Fallout getting turned into Oblivion 40K instead of a proper turn-based CRPG.

      Which goes to show this conversation isn’t new and gaming is old enoung now that it has gone in cycles.

      I mean, seriously, Daggerfall was continent-sized and was using procedural generation to make dungeons and build dialogue and quests and essentially reimagining how games could be made in ways that wouldn’t resurface until what? No Man’s Sky? Oblivion is bad Lord of the Rings. If anything it’s the awkward middle child now, because man, the Imperial City in Oblivion feels hilariously tiny and basically deserted against modern RPGs. There are five people running loops and having canned conversations. Coming from Baldur’s Gate 3 or Cyberpunk to this is… a bit of a shock.

    • missingno@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 hours ago

      “Why is an old game good?” feels like an odd question. It would be silly to ask that of any other medium, wouldn’t it? The most beloved classics being beloved isn’t an indictment of modern stuff, especially when cherry-picking the greatest hits and ignoring how many flops existed back then too.

  • Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I have no idea what’s your complaint are though, and it’s not a remake, it’s a remaster that is significantly better than a lot of other remaster have to offer. They could’ve gave us widescreen support, some lighting change, some new horse armour and call it a day, but they somehow able to snap an UE5 rendering on top of gamebryo, some modern QOL, new character models, modern lipsync, while retaining the charm that spawned an entire genre of meme.

    There’s a reason Witcher 1 isn’t getting a remastered but a remake. Gamer these day is so jaded and just can’t seems to satisfied with anything, that a witcher 1 remastered will get hated forever.

  • Supervisor194@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    You think this is a half assed remake? To me this feels like a significant upgrade (and not just to graphics) while maintaining the core experience and I’m kinda shocked at how good it is.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 hours ago

    It’s a remaster of a game from 2006 with a fresh coat of paint and some QOL changes and that’s basically all it ever could be. 70% of the game did not age well and they honestly did the best they could. If they did a complete remake and “modernized” the game all the old-school fans would be pissed. If they kept it as true to the original as possible besides a facelift they’d make it harder for new players to want to pick it up. I feel like a good 7/10 was the best they could shoot for under most circumstances.

    And if you ask anyone where Bethesda fell off, depending on which game was their first, they will all give you a different answer. For me Morrowind and Oblivion are the best in the series and that’s with over 500 hours in Skyrim. They’ve been dumbing their games down with each new iteration since the 90s as they try to “modernize” the newest game each time and reach new audiences. Like, good luck playing Morrowind or Daggerfall these days without losing your patience in a matter of hours. And Morrowind especially is barely playable without mods these days.

    I still hated Starfield, though. Gave it the old college try and left so underwhelmed I couldn’t tell you a damn thing about the story.

    • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      31 minutes ago

      The story was the most interesting thing about Starfield, since like me, the writers of Starfield also really loved the movie Interstellar. Unfortunately, nearly every plot line sort of wrapped up in an unfulfilling way for one reason or another.

      I think the gist of Bethesda games is that what they did was truly impressive 20 years ago, but each individual piece of them is kind of bad. The combat is bad, the story is bad, the RPG systems are way worse than their pen and paper roots, the NPC schedules tend to do little more than make quest givers just appear in slightly different locations, and what should be dynamic uses of physics and NPC line of sight never manifests in anything more interesting than putting a bucket on a shop keeper’s head to steal things.

      There’s nothing quite like a Bethesda game, because I think when another developer sits down to make a new game, they try to make one or more of those pieces way better than a Bethesda game rather than implementing everything that Bethesda implements, because plenty of it is bad and will be bad without being able to focus on it.

  • Omega@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    All I wanted from the remake was character models that didn’t look like cartoons and a leveling system that didn’t punish suboptimal builds, and by God that’s what they delivered.

    People keep clamoring for a Morrowind remake, and I disagree. It’s perfect the way it is. Oblivion NEEDED this.