Are they constantly imagining that they are talking to UNREASONABLE individuals?

I do not come from the US, but in somewhat lefty or centrist spaces I can’t see this style.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    My brother and I where talking about some psychotic episodes of some family members and its amazing how much it sounds like qanon stuff.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        not sure but hoax as in crazy origin or hoax as in no one ever believed it because im 100% folks believed it all they all might have had mental problems.

  • theneverfox@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Because the words aren’t to convey information, they’re there to convey emotion

    And semi-literate chuds need the key words to stand out or they won’t remember the topic to be angry about

  • davel@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Reporter: [REDACTED]
    Reason: ableism

    Please try to frame this otherwise than “mentally deranged” next time.

    • cub Gucci@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Hi there,

      Didn’t try to offend anyone. To my excuse, I can only say that I’m not fluent in English and didn’t know that “mentally deranged” is an inappropriate collocation.

      • davel@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Don’t worry too much about it. Most English speakers wouldn’t be offended, but rule #1 (“no bigotry”) for our Lemmy instance includes ableism, which includes sanism.

    • araneae@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      One can present a state of derangement independent of their normal mental health but which does endanger those around them while the state is ongoing. I hope you are not falling for garden variety concern trolling but even as a non-local user I wanna say I do appreciate your commenting (and that of the individual who filed the report) to prevent casual ableism.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 hours ago

    They want to emphasize certain words, but don’t really have the confidence and writing skills to do so in other ways

  • Four_mile_circus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Lol. They have strong feelings about what they type, they want to emphasize the strength of their feelings, and they believe ALL CAPS is SHOUTING ONLINE. No mental derangement required.

    I think that, in left-wing spaces, profanity fills a similar need. It shows you care so much about your topic that you can’t or won’t follow traditional rules of civility, that you aren’t being polished and professional but you’re speaking from the heart about how you really feel instead. Conservatives think using profanity makes you look bad (they don’t consider racial slurs profane, of course) so they inject emotion into their text in other ways. Eg CAPS LOCK.

    • Rodsthencones@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I agree. I’m just tired of the concept of profanity. It makes no sense to have words that can be used sometimes and not other times. Like don’t swear near a lady, or children. Use the word that means what you want to convey. Someday, it will cease to exist.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Oh yes, the left also likes to “spit truth”

      One of the most underappreciated things about writing posts for the internet is that the most factual treatment gets the best response. If you’re just an anonymous rando, people’s bandwidths for your personal feelings are limited.

      • Four_mile_circus@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        One of the most underappreciated things about posting on the internet is that the most factual treatment gets the best response

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          It’s legit. Not many people do it, maybe most want to talk more than be listened to, but I promise, the vote score it gets is better.

          That doesn’t apply to influencers and outlets, which are personality driven and can gain an aura of authority, just comment-waterfalls like this one.

          Maybe “underappreciated” is the wrong word, because it implies a value judgement. Edit: Nah, I’ll switch it to active voice.

  • Luke@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Partly it’s because they are engaging with the world from a primarily emotionally framed context at all times, which results in a stream-of-consciousness style of speech and writing. Especially when they get really worked up about something and their self-control melts away more thoroughly.

    It’s also not just from traditional conservatives. I serve on the board of my housing community, so I see a ton of this kind of thing from the mostly liberal neighbors living near me in a primarily gay community in the USA. Conversations on our local community forum site, or maintenance requests submitted to us are frequently filled with angry ranting nonsense that is barely legible.

    Sometimes someone will rant for a paragraph or two in ALL CAPS and insult everyone else living nearby, then their tone totally changes for the final paragraphs of the email. As if they became too angry to continue, stepped away for a bit, then came back later slightly calmer and continued writing with a more relaxed tone. Why they don’t restart the email at that point, I have no idea, but that communication pattern is really quite fascinating and sometimes worrying.

  • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I know it’s popular to call conservatives dumb and while I don’t like to beat dead horses, I really think the explanation for this is that they’re dumb. The illiterate form of dumb, to be precise. The caps are a way of adding emphasis - which is something that can also be done by phrasing, word choice, sentence structure, and so on. But those techniques would require a beyond 4th grade level of writing and reading ability, so they do not succeed in the conservative communication marketplace.

    I will add a disclaimer, my beloved Nietzsche also does all caps words sometimes, but I believe that since this is alongside his impressive eloquence, it is clearly not a sign of stupidity in that context. Likewise, it is not a sign of stupidity in many other contexts. That is to say:

    Using that style of communication does not always make it a safer bet that someone is stupid, but being stupid does make it a safer bet that they use that style of communication.

    • cub Gucci@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      I know it’s POPULAR to call conservatives DUMB and while I don’t like to beat dead horses, I really think the explanation for this is that they’re DUMB. The ILLITERATE form of dumb, to be precise. The caps are a way of adding EMPHASIS - which is something that can ALSO BE DONE by PHRASING, WORD CHOICE, SENTENCE STRUCTURE, and so on. But those techniques would require a beyond 4TH GRADE level of writing and reading ability, so they do not succeed in the conservative communication MARKETPLACE.

      I will add a disclaimer, my beloved Nietzsche also does all caps words SOMETIMES, but I believe that since this is alongside his impressive ELOQUENCE, it is clearly not a sign of stupidity in that context. Likewise, it is not a sign of STUPIDITY in many other contexts. That is to say:

      Using that style of communication does not ALWAYS make it a safer bet that someone is stupid, but being stupid does make it a safer bet that they use that style of COMMUNICATION.

  • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    For just a moment I was like, “I don’t do that!” but then I realized I sometimes do. It’s way of adding emphasis in text that doesn’t support markdown.

  • onlooker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 hours ago

    They’re just being considerate to people that are hard of hearing, so they yell in the comments so they are easier to listen to. I mean, obviously.

  • kidney_stone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Not entirely sure, I think it’s just the way some influential people started talking and now everyone is replicating it. The origins in why people talk like this is probably partly rooted in a mix of virtually ‘yelling’ and old people writing in all caps because they can’t see the small letters.

  • Doubleohdonut@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It’s like they’re submerged in a world of text-based begging letters. Take a faith healing correspondence, a soupcon of charitable dontaions, and a dash of chain letters. For a modern twist, blend in signs from homeless people.

    Whatever the motivation, when one person is desparate enough to try and persuade you to just give your money away, there’s a tone. If you grow up in that world, I imagine there’s a lot of reinforcement that seeps into daily conversation.