• cheers_queers@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    even the websites for local health systems have been going down. At this point if we have an event like Y2K was supposed to be, we are so fucked lol

  • magnolia_mayhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Hey! Great idea! Let’s make all of the internet rely on one service from one evil company! What could go wrong?

    • DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I think evil is too strong a word for Amazon, I think benzos is one of the nicer billionaires but I have heard the horror stories from Amazon warehouses.

      • IngeniousRocks (They/She) @lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        51 minutes ago

        Amazon essentially killed local bookstores and then used the proceeds to become a massive megaconglomerate only challangeable by alphabet, apple, and meta in their sheer capability to control media flow.

        They have spies in the form of Alexa enabled IOT devices basically everywhere. They also have the Ring camera. Recently they have stayed they will share data from Ring cameras with Palantir.

        Amazon is insidious. Its evil is quiet in its spread.

        The sheer size of Amazon, along with their business model, means they must employ vast swaths of people. In the US alone, over 1M people are employed by Amazon. Amazon plans to lay off half of them in the next 8 years while they shift to a robotic workforce.

        These “too big to fail” companies are not evil out of some malaise for humanity. They are evil out of a cavalier disinterest in anything other than increasing the size of their hoards.

    • grahamja@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Typical Amazon undersells everyone else to remove competition. Then after everyone has gone under reminds you it is a terrible idea. Hopefully we see businesses get burnt more and determine it is better to self host, or even better yet not need half their services on “the cloud” anyways.

  • Matriks404@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    I am grateful that my past me (from few months ago) decided to study Slavic philology, instead of getting stupid tech job. I hate modern tech, including anything from big corporations.

    I am also glad that I’ve switched to Linux (Debian ftw) to escape software enshittification.

      • luciferofastora@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I’d argue you cna never fully escape the problem of enshittification, unless you produce and maintain everything you use by yourself. Given how much of what we need today requires specialist labour and how impossible it is to be a specialist in everything, chances are you’d be trading enshittification for plain shit.

        But using Debian at least shuts down one source of enshittification. Just because perfection can’t ever fully be attained is no reason not to try and get as close as you can.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      It really shows what a great life that we on the Fediverse are living, by making our tech independent to a degree from the largest tech providers.

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    2 days ago

    Maybe it was a bad idea for society to put 90% of the internet on one company’s infrastructure.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 minutes ago

      At my work there was a big push to get things out of our own isolated data centers and into AWS because we had some services that were really very vulnerable and not equipped to serve a global distributed audience well. AWS solved that problem for us and our devs liked working with it. However now our AWS bill is so high that we’re pushing everyone to reduce it. I guess that makes sense. We’re not going back to self-hosting, just optimizing and reducing. But it sure feels like whiplash from “get everything into AWS” to “we have too much in AWS.”

      • cmbabul@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Accountants shouldn’t be allowed to make decisions beyond their personal lives. MBAs even more so

  • mesa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    135
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Amazon sneezes, the whole internet catches a cold.

    Im still seeing services up/down the entire day at work. Services that are not even AWS like Azure are slow for some reason (probably businesses failing over to other infa). Its crazy.

    None of our in office infa is having issues. Managers are talking about fail-overs all day lol.

    • tomiant@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      80
      ·
      2 days ago

      When a handful of people own all the companies in the world, the whole world becomes a single point of failure.

    • Boozilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      There are some downstream / knock on effects going on which can be explained…but I can’t help but wonder if today’s story is bigger than just AWS. AWS saying it was an outage of a “few hours” for DynamoDB and DNS…and that doesn’t line up all that great with what people are reporting in the wild . I’m not trying to start a conspiracy theory, just wondering what the post mortems will tell us, if anything. Obviously the suits want to keep embarrassing fuckups downplayed as much as possible.

      • Carrot@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        As someone with a little insider baseball knowledge, it was just a few hours down of DynamoDB and DNS. However, that caused EC2 to go down for ~1 day, which causes pretty much 1/3 of the internet to go down. Once EC2 sorts themselves out, then teams/companies (almost all amazon services use EC2 in the back end) that use EC2 have to get their ducks back in a row, and that can take any span of time, depending on how well their code was written to handle failures + how many people they are willing to pay oncall/overtime.

      • mesa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        2 days ago

        Its crazy, we are seeing unrelated services stop sending emails, issues with DNS, all sorts of strange stuff.

        • T156@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Maybe it’s cascade effects? Something depends on something else, which depends on a third thing that depends on AWS for something?

  • Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    2 days ago

    Let’s take a decentralized network and centalize it! Nothing will surely go wrong.

  • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s kind of telling when Amazon services like Ring, Prime Video, and Alexa failed over pretty quickly, but everything else just didnt.

    There’s no conspiracy here. It’s just highlighting that Amazon could prepare for AWS outages in a region, but since everything auth related was on us-east-1, everything else went down.

    Shortcuts are costly.

  • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    So Roblox is the only of those companies that can handle proper region failover if us-east-1 shits the bed? You young ops have gotten soft! Learn to live by ChaosMonkey or die by the Gorilla.

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, but proper failover and recovery requires additional infrastructure, and that costs money.

      Hopefully a bunch of risk management people are writing I-told-you-so emails to C-suites right now.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah but not to worry, C-suites have pretty good filtering rules in place to never read them. Saves time, really.

      • Boozilla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yup, and some things which can be moved cannot be done automatically, quickly or easily…even if you are prepared. AWS is a huge suite of products and services, and there’s a lot of old legacy shit running on it. I wouldn’t punch down on the ops for this one. Cybersecurity and disaster recovery are not directly profitable, so they are almost always neglected in your average shop.

        • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          AWS is a huge suite of products and services, and there’s a lot of old legacy shit running on it.

          Yup, AWS is legacy cloud. It was only recently that they set encryption by default on S3 buckets, before that they were just in the clear by default.

          Cybersecurity and disaster recovery are not directly profitable, so they are almost always neglected in your average shop.

          It’s never important until suddenly it’s the most important thing in the world.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 days ago

      So Roblox is the only of those companies that can handle proper region failover if us-east-1 shits the bed?

      Either that, or the reports stopped coming in since it’s a school day.

    • SSUPII@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Roblox doesn’t really lock down regions unless they are China. The game client can connect to any server they own. It naturally falls back to the server with the least issues without prompts and intervention. If for an even bigger example all US servers were to go offline, the client automatically redirects people to either Europe or Asia based on ping.

    • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think they’re the only ones doing multi-cloud. If us-east-1 shits the bed, it’s a bad day for AWS in general.

  • darvocet@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Jesus Amazon is a big enough company they should be doing their own hosting not using AWS.

    • ignirtoq@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Amazon is using their own hosting. AWS stands for Amazon Web Services. Or did I miss the joke?

          • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            17 hours ago

            I don’t always downvote posts that use /s, but I do always downvote posts that complain about someone not using it.

            Sarcasm is ok but deadpan is where it’s at.

            • Vespair@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 minutes ago

              This is the take. Let people communicate however they want, sarcasm indicator or not; it’s the insisting that others follow the convention you prefer which I find actually bothersome

    • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Once upon a time they insisted that Amazon had independent decision making on their providers when they were needing new infrastructure and they “always decided that AWS suited them best.”

      Shockingly (/s), they stopped making that claim right about the same time they started admitting that their biggest users are all under Private Pricing Agreements.

  • atmorous@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Time for open source Amazon app alternatives to be made. Made a post on OpenSource with suggestions on how to do it and how it can help open source communities: KDE, GNU/Linux, etc can each make their own and use their profits for their own and other open source projects. A passive income if you will from making, and managing the app that displays products from various partnered stores and websites

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      For some context, the issue was affecting AWS or Amazon Web Services, which is hosting for those other services (or parts of them), not an amazon app issue cascading to other services.

      And I don’t think an open source amazon app would work. Amazon is a lot more than just a webstore. They’ve got a massive logistics network plus warehouses and packing plants. I feel like an open source version of amazon’s store would end up avoiding the corporate shit but would have all the negatives of amazon store without many of the positives.