• GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    holy shit! the thing I’ve been warning developers who promote and use this shitty tool has finally happened.

    shockedpikachu.jpeg

    if you write fossy software, don’t use products made by fossy enemies.

  • Realitätsverlust@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    A company that is known for doing shitty things does shitty things.

    Color me fucking surprised.

    Honestly, at this point, I have ZERO sympathy for people who are still actively using microsoft products and running into problems.

    • Billegh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s just it, these extensions themselves refuse to run if the fork doesn’t say it is vs code. You’d have to build it yourself to report compliant information to the extension, or build the extension yourself to not check. Both of which are not trivial.

  • vermaterc@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    228
    arrow-down
    48
    ·
    3 days ago

    A few things to point out:

    • Microsoft created this extension and pays money to develop it
    • Despite that, they give it to programmers for free. It is still free of charge.
    • They explicitly said that using it outside of their products is forbidden (according to article: at least 5 years ago), they just didn’t enforce it
    • Someone (here: Cursor developers), despite that, used it in their products and started to make money from it

    What exactly are you mad at? When will programming community finally understand that Microsoft is not a non-profit company and its primary purpose is to make money?

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I heard Theo talking about this and I think he guessed that they don’t want to maintain these against forks is the number of people raising issues that are not related to the extension and more due to the fork.

      His video goes into a lot of good detail as to what’s likely going on.

      What Theo also says is that remember that they don’t make any money off of VSCode at all.

    • PokerChips@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because a .vscode still pollute most open source projects. It"s annoying that they get people hooked on it that could use better tools instead.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        74
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Embrace.

        Extend.

        Extinguish. Extract rent now that everyone lives in / depends on your proprietary ecosystem.

        I’d say they can’t keep getting away with it!, but history shows they clearly can.

        Literally monopolist strategy 101.

        • xthexder@l.sw0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 days ago

          This was all people were talking about when they bought GitHub. We’ve past the “Extend” stage now.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      The problem is that they’re killing competition. Treating a company with the market dominance of Microsoft like a normal company would be fatal for humanity. Because they are eliminating innovation by Cursor and they do not need to do this to finance their own innovation. Effectively, humanity gets less innovation by Microsoft doing this.

      • recall519@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        But Microsoft developed it in the first place. It’s perfectly within their rights to pull it and developers making money off of their work isn’t bad either. I love a good pitchfork to corporate, but this is honestly fine.

        • vivendi@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Well; companies used to get anti-trust laser canon’ed from orbit for less; but good luck with that in modern America

          • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            I wholeheartedly agree that monopolistic practices should be nuked instantly, but I disagree that this was ever well enforced. Microsoft got away with murder in the 90’s before they went to court and even then, feels like they got a slap on the wrist…

            I think that this particular case is very far from that, but it does start to smell the same.

            • Colloidal@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 day ago

              You should study about the trustbusting era of early 1900s. Then in the late 70s a new law reinforced antitrust legislation.

              The issue is that the pendulum swings fast away from trustbusting and slowly back to it. Trustbusting creates economic development and prosperity, reducing public outcry for it, and capitalists yank the levers of government again towards monopoly building.

              You mention the nineties, by even then Netscape successfully challenged Microsoft. But it was too little too late. The pendulum was already swinging back to monopoly, and it’s reaching it’s maximum in our days.

      • cley_faye@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        The problem is that they’re killing competition.

        So, they pay to develop a product, for themselves, explicitly says “it’s only for us, shoo shoo”, and when they decide that their product, that they pay for, and provide for free to their user, should not be used by other, it kills the competition that did not do anything except take the product for free despite being told not to?

        I’m not on the side of Microsoft for most things. But if doing nothing but taking someone else’s free product qualifies to be competition that should be protected, we’re having problems.

        • Ephera@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          You’re looking at it in isolation, I’m looking at it in terms of this being Microsoft, a company which has held humanity back for most of its existence, now retracting something where they did a decent thing for once.

    • x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      73
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s also blocked in VSCodium whose developers are not making money off it.

      So that’s not a nice thing.

      • monogram@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        3 days ago

        At least VSCodium cares about software licenses, (see it works both ways)

        That Cursor (an AI focused) fork doesn’t shouldn’t be very shocking.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Don’t be upset it took people a long time to realize Visual Studio Code is fauxpen source, just be glad they’re finally realizing it. No need to be condescending and make people feel ashamed over it.

    • priapus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 days ago

      Plus you can always just use clangd. Its what I’ve always used with every text editor that has LSP support.

      • XPost3000@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        Honestly moving to clangd has got to be the single best thing I’ve done in C++, it’s cross platform and I’ve found it to be significantly faster, more reliable, and more featureful than Microsoft’s C++ plugin by a long shot

        • priapus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I havent used vscode in while but I do remember having a lot of issues with the Microsoft C++ plugin, especially in large projects. I switched to clangd very quickly.

      • vivendi@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        I wish there was a GCC equivalent; but even if clang is a corpowhore project it’s atleast OSS

  • Auzy@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    Not sure about the c/c++ support, but zed has greatly improved and it’s looking like a real long term alternative at this point

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 days ago

    They pulled the same thing with their widely used office format: base capabilities are standardised but most useful stuff is proprietary extension.

  • EfreetSK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Here we go!!! I was expecting the enshitification of this thing for past couple of years

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      It was explicitly said to not use this outside of VSCode, so, I’m not sure where the surprise comes from.

    • deadcream@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      You are late. They have already did the same with C# extension, and made it closed source too.

      • synapse3252@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’m not up-to-date: what did they do to the C# extension? I’ve been using it on a personal project and haven’t experienced anything egregiously terrible (yet)

        • copygirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          3 days ago

          A lot of the C# ecosystem is open source (thank goodness), but the official debugger isn’t, hence it only being available in the proprietary version of VSCode.

  • UpperBroccoli@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Maybe it’s just me, but I never got that thing to work right anyway - with VSC. It keeps running amok and using up all the CPU time doing stuff it should not be doing, trying to analyze every single file in my VM every single time it is started.

    So… good riddance.