• aramova@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    5 hours ago

    To be honest those twats would already be on board with that.

    “Crosswalks? The fuck, you ain’t driving your truck across the street to get there? It too damn far!”

    – Florida Man

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      lol … conservatives would be the first to happily just get rid of cross walks altogether … both to not acknowledge LGBTQ+ and also to give more freedom to vehicles and get rid of “pedestrians”

      • SGforce@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        8 hours ago

        A good wholesome road needs to be safe for our traditional family SUVs and free of these dangerous ((pedestrians)).

      • TheRealKuni@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The ally flag gets fun colors! It’s the black and white background with a rainbow ∧ shape. I wear this as a pin sometimes. Also my favorite restaurant has one hanging proudly inside.

        • kersploosh@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I am 100% in favor of the message behind this flag, but holy crap it’s a real eyesore. Same with the Progress Pride flag and some of the other LGBTQ flags. I keep hoping some skilled graphic designers out there will come up with cleaner designs.

          • Zahille7@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Idk, I like the Progress Pride flag. Imo it makes sense and represents pretty much everyone. Yeah it has a lot of colors, but the design itself is pretty straightforward

        • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Lmao it’s been a minute since I’ve seen this. Guess I’ll go get some Starbucks and watch some Friends to recover from this burn.

  • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Yeah tbh. And it aligns better with the concept of sexuality/gender being more of a spectrum than rigidly designated buckets.

            • birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 hours ago

              Ironically Bryan doesn’t even understand the Bible, as God in the very Bible is described with not just masculine but also feminine and neutral attributes.

              They for example are described as being beyond humankind, yet the latter proceeding forth from them. Guy, gal, all proceeding forth from God; in other words, God isn’t a man, woman, but beyond either.

              It’s ragebait that he posts and either he knows what he’s doing (likely), or he’s just that dumb/hateful (also likely).


              The Bible itself is also pretty contradictionary. For example. God punishes slavery, by releasing the refugees from Egyptian servantry; yet he rewards Adam for snitching on Eve, and makes Eve a slave to him.

              The closest analogy to the fictional God is a power-tripping CEO like that of United Health.

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It… is kind of a giant mess.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbow_flag_(LGBTQ) is a good summary but the modern rainbow color scheme is a somewhat recent iteration.

        But much as “LGBT” has become “LGBTQ” and “LGBTQIA” and “LGBTQIA+” and so forth, so too have the flag added and removed stripes. And… a lot of that is intentional animosity since a shocking number of LGBTQIA+ folk are actually REALLY bigoted (the old “jokes” about how bisexual people need to “choose a side” and so forth) and it becomes a whole thing.

        • Cevilia (she/they/…)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I love the intersex-inclusive progress pride flag, which adds designs to the left that explicitly include three under-represented groups (BIPOC, trans+, and intersex).

          I once had someone, in earnest, complain at me that if we kept adding chevrons, the flag would have to get wider, and showed me an image that was like 1000 pixels by 20.

          And then got mad at me when I asked if I could have that as a scarf :)

          • birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Personally, the way I view it, the rainbow is most flexible, as it literally includes everyone (queer and nonqueer), and the progress pride (as in, pride + triangle with whatever is in there) mostly functions as an acknowledgement of especially repressed groups.

            View it like how countries have their national days, or how there are weeks of reading focused on a particular theme or subject (school homework included). That, but for queer stuff.

            • yucandu@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              The initialism, “LGBTQIA+”, feels disrespectful too. First because of everyone who falls under the “+” not being as important apparently, but second because it’s just a silly sounding name.

              I’ve heard “Sexual and gender minorities” or “SGM” as a more academic and professional sounding replacement, and I much prefer it.

              • Zahille7@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 hours ago

                After a while, the acronym just gets too long, especially when you have people complain that their particular group isn’t “properly” represented because their letter isn’t actually included in the acronym other than the “+” and it reminds me of that rap group OFWGKTA with all their ridiculous letters.

                I do agree with the “SGM” abbreviation when referring to all groups under the LGBT+ acronym.

        • birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          I haven’t really heard of those jokes and animosity. We’re not letting ourselves get divided, though.

          Comrade, remember that the fight is not with other queers, but with those who repress everyone; the oligarchs.

  • BoloMKXXVIII@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Why is Red on the left and Blue on the right? Don’t tell the MAGA crowd or they will try to pass another law…